Producing at the Berkley Center’s Religious Flexibility Venture blog, Samuel Gregg explores the notion – and idea for which new evidence is regularly emerging – that religious independence is very good for enterprise.
Gregg begins by noting historically that as specified religious groups have been marginalized in political life, they have turned their energies toward commerce – and prospered. In other instances, specified groups have been marginalized in their nation’s economic lifestyle – as a result handicapping the economy. This is not great for progress, obviously. Gregg then focuses his interest on the more lately identified correlation between economic progress and spiritual independence:
“[T]below is growing proof that regard for religious flexibility tends to correlate with greater economic and organization growth. One particular current tutorial write-up, for instance, found (one) a good connection in between international economic competitiveness and religious liberty, and (2) that spiritual limits and hostilities tended to be harmful to economic development.”
Furthermore, other rights and freedoms are not fully unaffected:
“[T]he strongest fascination that business has in getting attentive to the religious independence of people and groups is the truth that substantive infringements on a single type of freedom often have substantial and negative implications for other expressions of human liberty. If, for instance, governments can considerably nullify religious liberty, then they are absolutely able of repressing any other civil liberty. This provided rights with particular financial importance, these kinds of as the proper to financial initiative and creative imagination, property legal rights, and the flexibility of businesses to manage on their own in ways they deem essential to (1) make a profit and (2) handle employees in methods steady with the owner’s religious beliefs.”
He concludes by noting that, nevertheless:
“[M]ore function needs to be carried out in this location. Correlation is not causation. Even though there do seem to be to be important correlations between limits on religious liberty and the economic liberty of folks and company bodies, the circumstance for causation requires further elaboration.”
But, firms get observe!
“If . . . the numerous forms of liberty are as interdependent as they seem to be to be, company certainly has at least a large diploma of self-interest in observing substantive conceptions of religious liberty and the rights and protections related with spiritual flexibility prevail.”
Companies take notice, in fact.